Back to overview

Habitat selection of three gull species in response to sudden changes in human mobility

Unfortunately the abstract isn't available in English yet.
Developing robust strategies for human–wildlife coexistence is hampered by our limited understanding of how humans impact animal space use. It is challenging to measure the relative effects of landscape modification and human mobility on wildlife, since these factors are typically confounded. The extreme change in human mobility levels that occurred during COVID-19 lockdowns provided an opportunity to disentangle these impacts. Many gull species are considered urban adapters, capable of roosting, foraging and breeding near humans in highly modified environments. We predicted that lockdown-induced changes in human mobility would affect gulls’ selection for urban and beach habitats because of altered disturbance levels and food availability. We analysed GPS tracking data from 113 individual gulls over multiple years (2015–2022), across three species in western Europe (herring gull Larus argentatus, lesser black-backed gull L. fuscus and yellow-legged gull L. michahellis). We found that, during lockdowns, selection for urban areas increased in two of ten colonies and selection for beaches increased in one colony and decreased in two others. This heterogeneous pattern likely reflects differences in how gull populations respond to opportunities and challenges presented by human-modified landscapes. Understanding this context dependence is emerging as a priority for coordinated efforts to promote sustainable human–wildlife coexistence.

Details

Volume 292
Magazine issue 2061
Type A1: Web of Science-article
Category Research
Magazine Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B
Issns 0962-8452
Publisher Royal Society of London
Language English
Bibtex

@misc{3f59fa3d-e88f-4b97-9e99-73c6727352da,
title = "Habitat selection of three gull species in response to sudden changes in human mobility",
abstract = "Developing robust strategies for human–wildlife coexistence is hampered by our limited understanding of how humans impact animal space use. It is challenging to measure the relative effects of landscape modification and human mobility on wildlife, since these factors are typically confounded. The extreme change in human mobility levels that occurred during COVID-19 lockdowns provided an opportunity to disentangle these impacts. Many gull species are considered urban adapters, capable of roosting, foraging and breeding near humans in highly modified environments. We predicted that lockdown-induced changes in human mobility would affect gulls’ selection for urban and beach habitats because of altered disturbance levels and food availability. We analysed GPS tracking data from 113 individual gulls over multiple years (2015–2022), across three species in western Europe (herring gull Larus argentatus, lesser black-backed gull L. fuscus and yellow-legged gull L. michahellis). We found that, during lockdowns, selection for urban areas increased in two of ten colonies and selection for beaches increased in one colony and decreased in two others. This heterogeneous pattern likely reflects differences in how gull populations respond to opportunities and challenges presented by human-modified landscapes. Understanding this context dependence is emerging as a priority for coordinated efforts to promote sustainable human–wildlife coexistence.",
author = "Robert Patchett and Brian J. Smith and Chris B Thaxter and Niall H. K. Burton and Björn H. Franke and Scott W. Yanco and Ruth Y. Oliver and Diego Ellis-Soto and Marlee A. Tucker and Alexandra Loveridge and Julia Sommerfeld and Federico Ossi and Gary D. Clewley and Kees C. J. Camphuysen and Peter Desmet and Raül Ramos and Jacob González-Solís and Ros M. W. Green and Elizabeth M. Humphreys and Daniel T. Johnston and Luc Lens and Wendt Müller and Nina J. O'Hanlon and Frédéric Robin and Ángel Sallent and Judy Shamoun‐Baranes and Eric Stienen and Frederick Verbruggen and Christian Rutz",
year = "2025",
month = dec,
day = "17",
doi = "https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2025.2482",
language = "English",
publisher = "Royal Society of London",
address = "Belgium,
type = "Other"
}

Authors

Robert Patchett
Brian J. Smith
Chris B Thaxter
Niall H. K. Burton
Björn H. Franke
Scott W. Yanco
Ruth Y. Oliver
Diego Ellis-Soto
Marlee A. Tucker
Alexandra Loveridge
Julia Sommerfeld
Federico Ossi
Gary D. Clewley
Kees C. J. Camphuysen
Peter Desmet
Raül Ramos
Jacob González-Solís
Ros M. W. Green
Elizabeth M. Humphreys
Daniel T. Johnston
Luc Lens
Wendt Müller
Nina J. O'Hanlon
Frédéric Robin
Ángel Sallent
Judy Shamoun‐Baranes
Eric Stienen
Frederick Verbruggen
Christian Rutz