Perspectives on wolves after their recolonization in Flanders, Belgium
At the time of the wolf's (Canis lupus) recolonization in Flanders, public perspectives on this species were not well understood. To address this gap, we conducted a survey gathering demographic and contextual data to explore the relationship between these factors and public perspectives on wolves. We defined perspectives as: attitudes towards wolves, perceptions as whether they belong in Belgium, their mode of arrival, and attitudes towards wolf-related conflicts. Using redundancy analysis, we identified key explanatory variables, including hunting, residency, education, age, gender and dog ownership. Although these factors were significantly associated with perspectives on wolves, their explanatory power was limited, except for being a hunter. Notably, hunters generally had negative perspectives on wolves; however, hunters who stated they had negative attitudes towards hunting showed more positive perspectives on wolves. Conversely, non-hunters with positive attitudes towards hunting showed more negative perspectives. Attitudes towards hunting emerged as the strongest explanatory variable and may serve as a useful proxy for researchers studying wolf perspectives. Recognizing the diversity of stakeholder perspectives, particularly attitudes towards hunting, and underlying ethics could enhance the effectiveness of wolf conservation management.
Details
| Volume | 12 |
|---|---|
| Tijdschrift nummer | 3 |
| Type | A1: Web of Science-artikel |
| Categorie | Onderzoek |
| Tijdschrift | ROYAL SOCIETY OPEN SCIENCE |
| Issns | 2054-5703 |
| Uitgeverij | ROYAL SOC |
| Taal | Engels |
Bibtex
@misc{a8e54a60-c702-4cea-9978-5bcbca9e0dc7,
title = "Perspectives on wolves after their recolonization in Flanders, Belgium",
abstract = "At the time of the wolf's (Canis lupus) recolonization in Flanders, public perspectives on this species were not well understood. To address this gap, we conducted a survey gathering demographic and contextual data to explore the relationship between these factors and public perspectives on wolves. We defined perspectives as: attitudes towards wolves, perceptions as whether they belong in Belgium, their mode of arrival, and attitudes towards wolf-related conflicts. Using redundancy analysis, we identified key explanatory variables, including hunting, residency, education, age, gender and dog ownership. Although these factors were significantly associated with perspectives on wolves, their explanatory power was limited, except for being a hunter. Notably, hunters generally had negative perspectives on wolves; however, hunters who stated they had negative attitudes towards hunting showed more positive perspectives on wolves. Conversely, non-hunters with positive attitudes towards hunting showed more negative perspectives. Attitudes towards hunting emerged as the strongest explanatory variable and may serve as a useful proxy for researchers studying wolf perspectives. Recognizing the diversity of stakeholder perspectives, particularly attitudes towards hunting, and underlying ethics could enhance the effectiveness of wolf conservation management.",
author = "Hilde Vervaecke and Thaana Van Dessel and Peter Galbusera and Joachim Mergeay",
year = "2025",
month = mrt,
day = "19",
doi = "https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.231931",
language = "Nederlands",
publisher = "ROYAL SOC",
address = "België,
type = "Other"
}
